You're comparing apples with oranges. Just because a company says they're a HPA company does not make them equal.
For starters A4N have a functioning plant and have proven the product at scale, CCM have substantial cash burn and are still in FEED and QPM can't seem to decide on what they're doing (and also don't have great financials). Might as well compare them to CMX.
A4N versus QPM and CCM, page-2
Add A4N (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
84.0¢ |
Change
0.005(0.60%) |
Mkt cap ! $953.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 82.0¢ | 85.3¢ | 80.5¢ | $2.150M | 2.570M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 22246 | 83.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 84.5¢ | 4944 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 29/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| A4N (ASX) Chart |