I suspect the key part is Sharaz's statement that Reynolds has rejected his attempts at mediation. By not contesting Sharaz is indicating it was his desire to settle, but Reynolds has chosen to proceed to court. Sharaz's aim is to accept a loss on the defamation which may not be a huge financial sum, but have costs awarded against Reynolds based on her refusal to settle before this reaches court, so that whatever she receives (if anything) by way of an award for defamation is dwarfed by the legal costs she incurs in doing so.
. Reaper
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Sharaz chucks in the towel?
Sharaz chucks in the towel?, page-28
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 106 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton, MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton
MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online