Civil law is supposed to represent the expectations of the majority lay persons; in Oz that's coined "The man on the Bondi tram"; in Britain he's on the "Clapham omnibus".
Non withstanding Justice Lee's gut feel law of probabilities, I get the distinct feeling the majority of people on the Bondi tram don't share his opinion, many preferring the "it takes two to tango" conclusion.
This is the link to Sharaz's Twitter X post. It's interesting reading the general response from members:
