Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Sharaz chucks in the towel?, page-33

First 33 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
moondoong

49,273 Posts.

2

01/05/24

09:02

Post #: 73599144
Share

Originally posted by Reaper11 ↑

I suspect the key part is Sharaz's statement that Reynolds has rejected his attempts at mediation. By not contesting Sharaz is indicating it was his desire to settle, but Reynolds has chosen to proceed to court. Sharaz's aim is to accept a loss on the defamation which may not be a huge financial sum, but have costs awarded against Reynolds based on her refusal to settle before this reaches court, so that whatever she receives (if anything) by way of an award for defamation is dwarfed by the legal costs she incurs in doing so.

. Reaper

Expand

That doesn't make sense.
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ORD

Ordell cracks into gold mineralisation 'very close to surface' at McNabs East

BC8

'Big Sarah gets bigger' as Black Cat expands with acqusitions, tenement pegging

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

CC9

Chariot buys into 'highly prospective' hard-rock lithium JV in Nigeria

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

First 33 Last