so"This is what the C C Bible says about v17:3"This verse was clearly added in the editing of the gospel as a reflectionon the preceding verse; Jesus nowhere else refers to himself as JesusChrist." So nothing new that you said and trying to make a song and danceabout,"
So the CC Bible says, but not what the Bible says????????????
As the CC's formulated the Bible, compiled it, who then did the editing as you claim???m
^^^^^^^^^^
There is some debate among biblical scholars about the authenticity and possible later addition of certain verses in That’s correct wotsup, that’s exactly what it says as I have it, it doesn’t say that the CC had a hand in doing it, a commentary bible whether its CC bible, King James or others, adding comments on various verse text, doesn’t mean that it has been added or edited by those that are producing the bible
First I’m glad you admitted that the CC formulated and compiled the bible
Second it’s a commentary on this verse, There are some debate among biblical scholars about the authenticity and possible later addition of certain verses in the New Testament, including John 17:3. over time, copyists or scribes may have made minor changes or Textual criticism, which is the field of study dedicated to analysing and comparing different manuscripts of ancient texts, can sometimes shed light on potential variations or additions in the text.
It is also always possible that over time, copyists or scribes may have made changes
Scholars always apply (and its basic practice) Textual criticism, which is the field of study dedicated to analysing and comparing different manuscripts of ancient texts, can sometimes shed light on potential variations or additions in the text of any changes having been made
This is how it commonly applied with translators, not an issue whatsoever as its a standard practice, even to make notes in bible
They are not necessarily made by the Catholic Church as you are trying to imply, this is elementary except to you
Catholic bibles are not necessarily written by the church itself, most are written independently
As per-normal you are making a song and dance trying to find a straw in a hay stack to make your take on John 17:3 stick
The rest of your post is pure mish mash, and falls in the same category as whereu puts its “word salad” trying to make your point stick
All I can gather from your post is that you are a very mixed-up person, twisting and turning what I said in order to make your case stick, you have to many gears in your head trying to make your take on John 17:3 valid
Even if I told you, you are correct and I was wrong, you would still be in a complete mess, as like I keep telling you that verse is trinitarian when you sit down and consider all of the CC teaching as a whole and your mish mash its like the CC is quoting Quantum Physics and you quoting yourself without a basic understanding of elementary science
