I'm a former PLV holder but do hope to re-enter when I have some spare coin.
I think it?s wrong to suggest the fall in the sp is due to short term traders. I was disappointed in the announcement although of course there are numerous positives to it.
The fact no funding has been agreed to and more importantly, that the MOU is non-binding. I know Tony hopes to have things sorted within 30 days and I hope he does get a commitment.
I don?t see much point in securing this sort of 'agreement' given it commits neither party to anything, especially when the announcement says they hope to have binding agreements within 30 days.
It just all seems a bit unnecessary.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLV
- jtc speculation
jtc speculation, page-32
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)