I'm happy answer that Moggs as long as you allow the facts to sink in through that silly old skull of yours.
The wings were never going to make any indents in the stone outer, none. They would have probably broken those windows you can see on the left and right side of the main damage, but they would not damage the stone to much degree at all. The damage which I circled in a pic yesterday shows some damage and I would expect that would where the wing tanks were, so the additional fues weight was enough to cause that damage. The heap of debris across the lawns were most likely bits of the outer wings and whatever else was blown back there when the fuel exploded.
You always convemniently forget that there was a heap of aircraft bits all across the lawns. If you claim that it was planted I really have to doubt your sanity. As your theory would mean your missile hit the building and didn't explode but was full of Jet fuel which exploded and made the red flame. The a heap of people arrived and tossed aircraft bits all over the lawns including landing gear, black boxes, a 757 wheel, engine inner spindle etc etc, all of which were photographed. And they did all this while the joint was an inferno and emergency services had arrived. Then disappeared without trace. Do you see how stupid that is?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Pentagon Plane
Pentagon Plane, page-468
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 294 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug