Share
14,789 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 892
clock Created with Sketch.
09/05/24
10:32
Share
Originally posted by Tarvold:
↑
Mmm I suspect that it's the tenants who have seen the greatest fall in savings not the property owners? A lot of that cash was splashed on casual & part time workers who would never be able to buy a property. So you're right in a sense that rental stress & delinquencies will be on the rise but it'll be the tenants who go under first. And where do tenants go when they're unable to pay the rent? On the street. Rental vacancies will rise & rental prices will fall but there will never be a shortage of tenants. So worse case scenario is a big rise in homelessness & a fall in rental income, creating a bigger tax deduction to offset against other income.
Expand
You are laugh! The Whitsunday properties show you lose your tenants, and you lose your asset as well if you are dependent on them being there. Newcastle example shows you that your assumptions are simply wrong. Japs not being here at all now is another example of you being wrong.
Last edited by
nippy :
09/05/24