Four Reasons Why Nuclear Power is a Dumb Idea for Australia, page-183

  1. 84,039 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 75
    3 points

    1. Why no one has been able to lay a glove on her arguments is because they are sound. And there is nothing at all new in what she says - it's just put in a way that the 'newly nuke drinkers' can understand it and have gods own trouble arguing against it logically and are limited to their 'doh' level debates

    2. The newly contrived nuclear debate was the invention of the Liberal Party - perhaps Dutton himself ---------- the Liberal Party highly likely have absolutely zero intention of going nuclear - but, just making what they hope will be politically gainful noise about it - nothing more

    3. The nuclear debate should be dispatched asap like a well rotted piece of meat found in the back of the fridge -------------- and what SHOULD be up for discussion is what happens AFTER the takeover of weather dependent renewables

    In a totally dependent connected world - including power networks - with renewables in the mix - there are far more significant risks that should be addressed atm - we indeed, should be looking 20 to 50 years down the track to what comes after renewables (if we can attempt foresight)

    It is highly likely that for nuclear - that this is a last gasp for the nuke industry globally. As has been said by the Rosie video - there are countries where it makes sense, - Australia is not one of them.

    But even for those countries where new nuke plants are coming on line - in 30 years, - they will more than likely be obsolete - certainly 50

    Technological development is moving way too fast for going to old technology atm - unless you have to - nuclear is old technology - and Australia does not 'have' to

    Dutton is either pushing a political barrel or he really has no idea
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.