well, they shouldn't really ---------- because if they look at Tassie - they will see that the Hydro there has been a management disaster for decades
my fascination was not as you cherry picked - my fascination was how we have a failing in a tech we know about - but, think we can perform brilliantly on a tech of which we have pretty much zero knowledge
there is no fascination in our poor management of hydro assets -------------- if you peer inside the Hydro and look at the individuals - you would walk away shaking your head
and that is the point ------------ the calibre of the management that makes you go wtf??
is the same calibre of management that we would get on nuclear projects -
their ????? capability -------- guarantees a fu of gigantic proportions
Whilst I understand that you don't like solar and wind etc - you really need to think it through - because solar and wind (remember, at a basic level, I don't like them either) -- whilst solar and wind have some risks -
the FACT is that we do have expertise there atm - and they ARE being put on the ground and they are being commissioned and functioning and the cost of providing power is far cheaper by S&W than nuke or coal or gas ---------- and also that transmission networks badly need upgrading anyway - no matter what the source of power is ------------ and we also have an industry developed that is doing that now - and they of course, have improved in quality over the last 50 years
it's worth thinking through unless you want to look like a sausage making out of date codger with a dodgy prostate
![]()
- Forums
- Political Debate
- When you turned on the light
When you turned on the light, page-28
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 90 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online