9/11 fire-fighters: explosives in building, page-221

Listen to Jon Faine (ABC774) last week try and dismiss Kevin Bracken's concerns re 911 as "conspiracy theory":

http://www.abc.net.au/local/audio/2010/10/20/3043311.htm

*One minute talking with Kevin (who offered to debate), two minutes wasted dismissing his concerns via interviews*

Here's a point Jon and some people in this thread don't understand: if WTC7 was a controlled demolition we don't have to have a neatly packaged story that ties up all the loose ends for you! The fact that it happened is enough to hear us out at the very least fcs.

Then Jon follows it up with this piece of rubbish, again not covering the questions:

http://www.abc.net.au/local/videos/2010/10/22/3046082.htm?site=melbourne

He explains how his office has been flooded with "conspiracy theorists" traffic thinking - "Ah here is a point where we can have our claims fully explored".

Well let's see you do that Jon, let's see it indeed.

The fact of the matter is YOU HAVE NOTHING (I count saying "conspiracy theorists" and calling people "loonies" over and over as nothing btw) like all the other close minded people on this thread who refuse to even look at the info. I'll bet anyone any money you like Jon will leave this topic alone from now on. There is no debate.