Resurrection of Christ, page-954

  1. 27,919 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1
    I put it to you as I said, you CANNOT support ppm's claim, or numerous peoples claims from way way back, they are ALL speculation.

    Regardless of God having no lungs, the simple fact of the matter and regardless as to how he did it, the breath of life has to be referring to nothing more than breath = oxygen, which all life forms need = SIMPLES and no crazy imaginations required.

    Are you now abandoning your science logic etc and putting forward your wants, or like to be's?
    ------------
    I would be happy with the likes of ppm's view, but as of yet, I haven't seen anyone show the Bible support for it.
    -----------
    "The one interpretation which I believe is the least likely is yours."

    As of at the moment, it's the one being put forward with the Bible backing.

    I would be happy to see the verses that support the other.

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.