General discussion (MEI), page-4812

I'm just an investor myself, my personal opinion is those issues are not significantly material to the future of the project. It is unfortunate to see response from the market.

There are 4 other tenements (5 if you count Dona Maria 1 & 2 seperately) that contribute significantly to the MRE - all of these are pending resource updates prior to the scoping study release scheduled for June - resource updates that, IMO only, should put a rather large shadow on the recent share price performance.

Anyone who has been paying attention to the drilling results should understandably be excited to see the remaining resource updates - and the all important scoping study expected in June will detail the economics which again, IMO are expected to be very impressive against peers due to grade and recoveries...

I'm sure anyone with concerns are more than welcome to reach out to Andrew or the Meteoric team, as has always been the case.

Otherwise, IMO it's always best to contrast one problem along with the overall picture, often puts things in perspective.

A big month or two ahead for catalysts with Meteoric, plus Andrews regular spot at the Rule Symposium may well attract more market attention for Meteoric in the US.