Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Nuclear to cost $17b and twice as expensive as renewable energy, page-116

First 116 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

43,318 Posts.

642

22/05/24

21:58

Post #: 73963847
Share

Originally posted by AmbrosePethick: ↑

I haven't read the CSIRO report but am reliably informed that the CSIRO claim that a nuclear plant will only last 30 years(the same as ruinables) and this is simply not correct.

It is possible that a nuclear plant could last 100 years where it is known that solar and wind factories only last around 25 year.

Also nuclear plants produce power 24/7/365 unlike ruinables.

Blackout, and his cronies will go down it history as those that tried to destroy Australia and Australians. Blackout is a traitor.

Expand

of course you think you know better than a team of scientists and engineering experts in nuclear energy.
4 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

FEX

From the Floor question: "When will FEX start using rail to augment & de-risk their haulage solution?" | Fenix Resources

CC9

The USA's dominance requires a domestic lithium supply chain. Chariot stands to benefit

Chris Judd's Talk Ya Book: Tracking Life360 on a journey to the stars

AL8

From the Floor question: "What is the focus of AL8 and how is management going to attract shareholders to the registry?" | Alderan Resources

SXG

From the Floor question: "Could gold be manufactured in a lab like diamonds?"

There are more pages in this discussion • 116 more messages in this thread...

First 116 Last

SPONSORED BY