Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

CSIRO at last telling the Truth, page-146

First 146 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Cowboyinvestor

23,690 Posts.

33

23/05/24

12:37

Post #: 73974023
Share

Originally posted by tinnitus: ↑

Lets start this again and I will type slower so that you can process it.

Your extract contained this statement

"Feasible alternatives to renewables were excluded from the analysis through the selection of scenarios that enforces binding renewable energy and carbon targets."

I asked "Should we ignore the binding renewable energy and carbon targets?"

This means do you , Cowboy Investor, think that we should ignore the binding renewable energy and carbon targets?

I looked through your extract and I can not see where it says that Cowboy Investor agrees or disagrees with this statement.

A simple Yes I agree , or a No I dont agree is all that is needed.

Expand

“…I will type slower…” are we pausing for effect, or did you hit send and realise how stupid this statement is.

what part of my answer is confusing you? Let’s start there
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

'Set and forget' vs. DIY super: Which strategy wins?

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 025 – Locksley rap video gives Hilltop Hoods run for money

HotList Stocks: GoldArc, Auravelle, and other trending Week 38 companies

HotCopper Highlights: Stakk's out-of-nowhere Robinhood deal; ADNOC dumps Santos after first date & more

NVQ

Market shows partial interest in Noviqtech as company flags launch of 'quantum' chatbot

First 146 Last