Ann: Testwork Improves Metal Recovery & Concentrate Grades, page-18

"You will always get people on HC who are Upramping (usually holders) and people who are Downramping (almost always non-holders).

I've never really understood the mentality of non-holders who constantly try to denigrate a company in which they don't have any financial interest. I suspect that they must be very bitter and unhappy people."
------------------------------
I get downramping appears to holders to be a nefarious exercise by non holders, but that is simply an acute bias based on the fact you hold and the definition is tainted consequently. The alternate perspective is the opinion is based on facts that can be readily checked by participants. So bad for holders, but good for people researching an asset.

Upramping with bias and no basis in fact other than tangential implication is nefarious, but good for holders (short term) and not good for researchers an asset.

Its odd how people think the only people who can comment on threads are holders and if they do then it must be favorable. Superimposing your bias and ostracizing non holders is understandable, but disingenuous to the pursuit of truth and mitigating risk. If a company doesn't meet its targets then that should be called out. If pumpers incessantly post that everything is fine when its not, then that should be called out.

With commodity prices better than they have been (albeit in a correction), the project is better placed (not perfectly placed). That wasn't the case previously.