In my opinion, the nuclear option only has merit if you believe that mmCo2 is a threat.
The cheapest, safest and most reliable option for providing Australia with energy security is coal and gas fired power stations.
If I had to choose between the other systems I would have to go with the option that provides long term continuous energy generation than the intermittent varieties but that’s just me and I’m open to the idea that future scientific advances could sway me.
No side of politics has a hold on Good Ideas that is why I discount the vast majority of what the Party plebs try and shove down our throats.
