No, I won't - I'm just curious what goes through a persons mind when they assess the risk reward ratio of catching an influenza variation and an injection that FDA, CDC, Pfizer, NIH, NHS, The Lancet, BMJ The NEJoM, TGA have all conclusively stated that there is a risk involved and that it does not do what it was intended to do? And this was back in 2021.
So how did you weigh up the potential risk and what criteria did you use to establish that the injections were 'safe and effective' when all the government bodies and agencies have stated it is not.
My question is in search as to why all those agencies and their disclosures made me take an totally opposite path by not participating in the biggest medical trial in history.
Curious, what makes you think the way you do? Have I missed something in my analysis of the potential risks?
