I’m not debating that. Whatever the interpretation I think that we either accept the words of the ICC or we don’t. If we don’t then we can’t use it in these debates.
the ICC whether you agree with it or not did not rule genocide. So everyone on here who has used they label over and over again either thinks they are better informed, smarter or morally robust than ICC or they don’t know what they are talking about
maybe a bunch of you should get together and write to ICC rather than complain on hotcopper
I have no difficulty with facts - hence my repetition that in the posts discussing the icc decision one either uses facts of the decision or one is making stuff up or misrepresenting things for personal purposes. When you do that you are no different from any other propagandist.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Before he speaks on Rafah....
Before he speaks on Rafah...., page-91
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 196 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online