Share
10,133 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 86
clock Created with Sketch.
28/05/24
18:03
Share
Originally posted by Parsifal:
↑
I’m not debating that. Whatever the interpretation I think that we either accept the words of the ICC or we don’t. If we don’t then we can’t use it in these debates. the ICC whether you agree with it or not did not rule genocide. So everyone on here who has used they label over and over again either thinks they are better informed, smarter or morally robust than ICC or they don’t know what they are talking about maybe a bunch of you should get together and write to ICC rather than complain on hotcopper I have no difficulty with facts - hence my repetition that in the posts discussing the icc decision one either uses facts of the decision or one is making stuff up or misrepresenting things for personal purposes. When you do that you are no different from any other propagandist.
Expand
I’m not making anything up, just repeating more knowledge commenters who are more experienced than l am in interpreting the tactical aspect of the legal language.