Whatever event that you look at to get a opinion you have to, in today's world dissect it into it's components
To arrive at the guilty verdict covers many items -- are they all clear and compelling ?
Most matters do not require you to be a scientist, lawyer or a doctor, they just take an ability to observe and logically evaluate
There were many legal items that did not make sense in this farce of a court case and if you look at legal definitions they were simply ridiculous from a common sense perspective
Ultimately any suggestion that this court case represents a real crime is saying that the legal system and hundreds of years of precedence has been thrown out the window
It was a political stunt, no more, no less
- Forums
- General
- Take a Paws
Take a Paws, page-33621
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2,467 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online