Climate Change, page-931

More assertions, no citations of any sources.

"All you ever do is say "this guy is a scientist and he agrees with me that we need to stop burning coal".

Please show me where I have said this. It is easy to screen shot, so go back and show me. I know you cant, because I never claimed anything was true because a scientist said it.

You said
"Amazingly, you assert this [rising temps lead to rising CO2 released from oceans], without once again providing any evidence for"

But what I actually said was;
You - "And yes, again, colder water absorbs more CO2 so the rise in temperatures along with the rise in CO2 is the first causing the second rather than the other way around."Me -Amazingly, you assert this, without once again providing any evidence for.

Your premise is correct, your conclusion is incorrect.

"You literally already agreed it was true. If colder oceans absorb more CO2 then, ceteris paribus, warmer temperatures lead to rising CO2. That's the direction of causality. Now, if it was a positive feedback loop (which is what climate change "science" [inadvertently] claims) then we would have had a runaway global warming a long time ago."You need to go do some basic physic and statistic classes.


CO2 levels in the ocean is increasing, not decreasing. So the additional CO2 being added to the atmosphere isn't coming from the ocean. (Remember, there is natural carbon flux - the ocean does absorb CO2, and degasses at approximately the same rate).

Amazingly, the data agrees. Here's my source (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-18203-3) and they show that the ocean is a carbon sink for approx 25% of anthropogenic CO2.

So your assertion that "so the rise in temperatures (what, temperature are you talking about? Land? Sea? Atmospheric?)along with the rise in CO2 is the first causing the second rather than the other way around."

Oh and by the way, if you took a look at the video "Does Co2 lead or lag temperature" it actually goes through everything, with citations. But I doubt you'll go look.

"But no such event has transpired, so it's not a positive feedback, ergo, rising CO2 *does not* cause rising temperatures. The Mars situation reinforces this."How does the Mars situation reinforce this?

QED. No amount of "research papers" can change that. Maths tells us that climate change "science" is a lie. Given a choice between maths and trans activists masquerading as "scientists" I'll trust maths.

Amazing how a couple of WHC posters have stumbled upon this, but no one else has. Very interesting.

Your F Tier debater literally proved mathematically that you're wrong.

Except you didn't. What a shame.