Share
4,885 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 221
clock Created with Sketch.
06/06/24
13:41
Share
Originally posted by Cowboyinvestor:
↑
Do you mean facts like the Greens and independent's opposition to nuclear ? - That's not a fact... that's a hypothetical, that was already dealt with in my response.Hinkley Point 3 ? - another fallacy. You're trying to remove known averages to anchor an argument on an exception. Again.. not factual. 6-8 years is factual.No permanent waste storage ? - Dealt with. The total nuclear spent waste for the world could be contained in a single football field. Australia's waste would be a minute % of that, and there is technology dealing with recycling spent rods currently. Water use ? Coastal locations ? - Dealt with. 45% of the worlds reactors use sea water for once through cooling. Additionally Australia has an abundance of tropical rainfall. All of which will be dealt with once the legislative prohibition has been removed and planning can begin Competing with renewables ? - Renewables arent competing with legacy brown energy. Factually.
Expand
nice points....its interesting you quote a new technology for dealing with waste...so where do you see renewable, especially battery , technology in 2 yrs ,5 yrs, 20 yrs
Last edited by
kingy :
06/06/24