confirmation on resolution 5, page-40

thank you very much winbig and i hope you do just that with this stock.

I do agree with you that option holders have the most to gain/lose but that does not mean you are a loyal holder. The options will expire regardless of upcoming news and what have you not. That is why options are always a gamble, you take up options and have a punt at the direction of heads in the time frame which has been chosen my management. Now we could've simply had the quarterly and that brief update which was provided. Then there could've been a silence stretching beyond the options date with nothing really substantial being released to lift the heads. All the research in the world wouldn't have pointed to this outcome but in the long run that stock could've tripled... The point to all of this dribble is that in my eyes options are a gamble, heads are an investment. Hence, holders of share should be deemed the loyal shareholders.

Either way, if the options were presented to holders of shares or options there would've some sort of sell off anyway so its a rather futile argument.

At the end of the day i'm not 100% against it but i'm for it either so the logical conclusion is to vote against it. We all know that this company is heading onto bigger and better things and when the fundamentals of this company eventually become concrete the traders will play a minimalistic role in the advancement of the SP but until then, i see them as doing more damage then good.