Why IMU is a multi multi bagger, page-24387

I have noticed a lot of posters whom had a pretty good knowledge of the science and were generally positive of IMU have not posted in a while. I looked up a couple and they are posting on other threads so maybe just moved on, not sure but the general vibe of late is pretty toxic.
Happens when SP is going downhill, there was a big belief that an outstanding result was going to be announced at one of the conferences earlier in the year and it wasn't to be, news didn't come and boom broke to the downside.

Add to this some senior people in IMU leaving S. Priceman and reportedly N. Eade. Add to that the comments from a trial participant who had a bad experience Rock_Robster, (wish him well) and bingo the doubts creep in the reaction starts small but soon becomes a pile on and this is where we're at.

Lesley's pic with YF, well a picture can say a thousand words, to me it says were are still in this and were are up for the fight, hang in there.