Australian newspaper article, page-105

Hi Col,

" You’ve got enough to get approved for children "

What exactly are we talking about here? 'Enough' what? Enough courage? Enough Fruitburst mini-muffins? Enough photocopying paper?

Honestly, 'news' journos. Everything's clickbait these days. Let's not read words that aren't there into a non-ASX publication by a 3rd party. Especially one that has to sell 'news'. To me it's no different to reading something tart & spiky out of AFR.

And I'm fairly sure I've read that the FDA's view on confidentiality of meeting results is that it's basically the sponsor's confidentiality to waive as it chooses. Makes sense to me.

Actually, reading the 'article' I don't see the time sense of events as completely distorted by the author - there was no January meeting AFAIK, altho' I'm pretty sure there was correspondence back & forth in that month. Then the new clinical data was lodged (somewhere between 31 January AU time and the end of February). Then the FDA got back to us & said whatever they said that prompted the 26 March '24 announcement. I can read all of that consistently with the journo's 'Business' article.

Cheers
Have a great day all