Ann: Investor Presentation, page-396

Time to put the biased opinions aside for a while and hope for good news to come for both companies over the coming months.
I hope you and your FB group filled up your cups, pots and pans with shares when it was in the 20s, 30s and 40s. If so, well done. And I sincerely hope that there is more to come - for all of us.

I think you are hoping for good news (on Mesoblast) because you've been analysing the wrong stuff. But hey I'm biased.

After reading the alleged statements in The Herald Sun and apparently The Australian where I think Silviu is slightly more expansive about what the FDA said to him - if you believe the account and noting a reference to going to the FDA in January - the reporter says that about January - he isn;t quoting Silvu but it sounds from the article that Silviu heard what the FDA said in January from the article - I went back to some of Silviu's comments in the Hidden Gems preso on youtube at S hare c afe -which was in March )there btw he is anticipating going to the meeting). Also note that MSB made their ASX announcement on 27 March.

The way Silviu was talking at Share Caf e prior to the 27 March Announcement he was still preparing to discuss a new analysis of old data (not new data mind - just new analyis) relating to the potency assay.

He wouldn't have been talking cautiously like he was at s hare cafe in March if he'd heard the FDA say what the article (I think the reporter stuffed up the January reference) it had happened in January.

I think was actually happened is that just prior to the 27 March announcement Silviu and MSB got feedback from the FDA which they interpreted - then put their interpretation out in the announcement and since then he's been adding what that nitwit Bell Potter analyst calls color.

The only way I can credit MSB as actually being told what Silviu is quoted as said in The Herald Sun is if the so called leadership group is much dummed down to what the former FDA personnel were because Silviu has said (s hare cafe) he is presenting no new data- just re-analysis of old data - and there simply isn;t enough of that to rule of confounding.

Nothings changed.

I think if you'd taken up my requist/inviting to try to summarise what you understood of what I'd written that enabled me to get the call right on the CRL # 2 - you'd have either faulted my logic or you wouldn't be holding out hopes against what I think is a clear data trail (but again I am biased). I think that would have been a better use of your time and would have helped me - (but I'm biased and your time is yours to allocate).

I did read your short version where you tagged me in the middle of a reply to otherperspective I think. I've also read posts relating to Myriad/Mayo etc (or most of them) - in my opinion you are chasing otherperspectives rabbits. The actual patents and patent applications MSB have been working on - the two I've referenced recently are facts - otherperspective doesn't even sustantiate his statements - replying to someone that posts like that is risking normalising that sort of behavior in my opinion. Truss20 I noticed didn't take the bait and switch by otherperspective.