"Keep in mind if they've completed 'internal met work', if any of that is price sensitive, the market needs to know about it for ASX compliance."
These internal "in house" (internal Metallurgy test) data results are not 3rd party compliance certified. This data is for reference and an understanding heading towards targeting a resource modelling. Generally these type of potential announcement are declined by the ASX as they could tend to be bias to the positive. If they do slip through the ASX there will be a please explain on the this data and if found to not be processed through the correct regulatory channels will be asked to retract the announcement. Many Coy have made this mistake and not professional. Same for any data derived from a RXF gun, classified as potential not fact. Price sensitive in relation to metallurgy results is Tangible data.
Met's were never pushed back. VMS1 just got it wrong. (off the cuff remarks). We definitely agree there. One thing I've noticed with VMS2, PL is a straight shooter and Tim very precise. Look forward to Phillipa's review.
GL @Paul7890
Ann: 8m @ 5,716ppm TREO- Jupiter Drilling Continues to Outperform, page-209
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.7¢ |
Change
0.001(6.25%) |
Mkt cap ! $45.86M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.6¢ | 1.7¢ | 1.6¢ | $30.89K | 1.924M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1607396 | 1.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7¢ | 1623380 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CRI (ASX) Chart |