I didnt claim it was conclusive, I dont think in realistic terms anything can really be conclusive. In the same respect that if it an equal amount of evidence claimed a bridge to have structural integrity issues, I'd accept that and wouldn't risk crossing the bridge.
There's plenty of data points, independent of each other, independent sciences, and they corroborate with each other.
Hey, if you dont accept it, thats fine. Doesn't bother me. As long as you dont go spread misinformation, especially when off-topic - would you agree with that?
Climate Change, page-1044
Add WHC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$8.32 |
Change
-0.110(1.30%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.960B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $8.40 | $8.57 | $8.21 | $70.24M | 8.520M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23024 | $8.32 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $8.33 | 13633 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 19/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WHC (ASX) Chart |