Why IMU is a multi multi bagger, page-24741

"............... more complete communications would help shareholders understand the current situation and the timeframes for each product development..........."

Howdy Davy. Many thanks for the article and comments. Really good stuff. Ref your statement above not entirely convinced this would be the case. Unfortunately we seem to have a fair number of contributors (if ever I saw an oxymoron) willing to run with all manner of spin on side issues. Tend to think even if we had a stenographer on site pumping out all the internal conversations it likely would add to the amount of misleading and confusing diatribe here on HC and only serve to further suffocate worthwhile info such as brought to the table by your good self.
Suggest comms can always be improved however in the case of IMU & LC in particular suggest they have pretty much focused on and stuck informing the market regards core objectives and outcomes. That recent preso by LC being no exception. For what it is (probably not) worth my feeling is that we are in that stage where releasing news gets very tricky as to what can and cannot be said without causing issues either for management or the market. Frustrating but a case of no news being good news. Not a time to speak of side issues as this will simply cause the market to become confused.
Good w/e all