"You're calling John a liar. And being smug about it. That's just like you. If something doesn't line up with your interpretation it is either lies or corruptions. You didn't address John's reply. Completely dodged it as if you can get past it to everyone who reads what you write."
Clearly your lights went out, and that is, if they even come on, as I well and truly addressed John's reply and dodged zero and my reply was not my interpretation but the Bibles.
You clearly it would seem, do not grasp what being from heaven or above can mean and represent, which I clearly showed you From the Bible. Those people that the Father gave Jesus, can be deemed as - of God, of above, of heaven, just like Jesus can be and is.
The literal aspect of Jesus coming from heaven is as per -> the word and power of the Fathers came down and made the 2nd Adam = heavenly, because he was not made of dust. That is all that came down and Luke makes this very clear. Let there be light - let there be a Jesus. ------------------ "Oh, yes the man Jesus, the Son of Man"
OH dear me -> are You aware of how many times that Ezekiel is referred to as the Son of man? Does that make him duality? hmmmm
