"my support for nuclear would be the need for domestic nuclear to support nuclear weapons." .. really? what good would nuclear weapons do for us?
teh more aggressive our stance the more likely we are to be attacked. with nuclear weapons, we become a threat, so we become more like to be threatened.
and what of the cost? not just the purchase of something that will (hopefully) never be used, but also the maintenance and the manning of such weapons as well as the technology for managing the systems.
what price peace? we can save the money, or spend it better, while not being seen as a potential destroyer of another country.
how many does China have, and Russia. if we were attacked by a nuclear power the US would use their nukes. no need for us to have any.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Energy experts discuss nuclear - it ain't good
Energy experts discuss nuclear - it ain't good, page-91
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 48 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)