One thing that has yet to be raised (unless I have missed it), is that the free market LNP nutters cannot tell us why Nuclear would not be commercially viable, i.e.. why the tax payer has to fund it?
Meanwhile, the vast majority of renewables ARE funded by private enterprise eg huge wind and solar farms, batteries etc . Banks and Financiers are willing to risk hundreds of millions on this - but not nuclear.
Can someone enlighten me ?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Dutton's folly
Dutton's folly, page-80
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
MND
Monadelphous inks $200M contract with Woodside to help build Pluto LNG – but will it make Scarborough cheaper?
NVA
Nova locks in NASDAQ US market listing at a value of only US$3.3M as ASX gets quieter and quieter