COVID AND THE VACCINE - TRUTH, LIES, AND MISCONCEPTIONS REVEALED, page-98048

The point of the cat post was to highlight that unless you look at those exposed to Covid and those never exposed to Covid and each in turn that got vaxed ( 4 sets ) you have no way of being able to say what happens afterwards is due to the vax and not Covid exposure.

This is how you reduce the chance of assuming correlation equals causation being a mistake.

This is the reason I ask the question.

Assumptions lead to some of humanities biggest calamities.

As Eye of the Tiger points out the 4 sets is just a start as you have to look at further subsets within the data eg comorbidities and age. MSB managed to save a significant number of people under 65 but was of no use for those over 65 at the death rate peak in the early days. Just one example of taking the data further as overall the greater number of people over 65 in the study made the overall stats show no significance. It's complicated - sorry that just how it is. Makes no difference of you want it simple - it is what it is. More than just age a factor in the MSB trial.