Part of the problem with dealing with management from companies is poor or unclear communication or just leaving out valuable information.
What I gathered from the call (if I understood correctly), is assuming that Leo maintained 26%, any future funding for capex/expansion would have to come from Leo/Ganfeng only and Mali wouldn't have to pay anything. Therefore Leo/Ganfeng who would own 65% would have to put up 100% of the cost to fund future capex/expansion, and that's what makes it financially unviable for Leo.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LLL
- Ann: Leo Lithium Investor Webinar Presentation
Ann: Leo Lithium Investor Webinar Presentation, page-76
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 94 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LLL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
50.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $605.4M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
LLL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable