No one here and this includes you, know the specific potency assay components.
I think I do know them - if I was you I'd assert I do know them - (because that's how you roll) because on the basis of all that I do know from the public domain - I know they had two at ODAC and what they were - I know the patent application and patent granted contents I posted about recently. Same two.
I know they have not said they solved the potency assay problem - and I know Silviu was concerned about it as recently as the start of March this year.
I know they talked of gold standards as though lesser standards in potency assay might be acceptable.
In short I am confident I do know MSBs potency assay - its two parts - its TNFR1 levels and its IL2Ralpha inhibition on co-cultured T cell levels.
And, separately, the above was just rebuttal - saying there is evidence a lot of it in the public domain though you won't see it through eyes clenched shut, I know it must remain as a weak point for two reasons - I understand the science MSB has presented and second I understand MSB has not said they have a validated potency assay or that the FDA said they did - and it would have been a huge deal if they could have said that - previously before CRL # 2 MSB had even claimed they had a validated potency assay - but that was in their opinion - then the FDA disagreed and they couldn't say that anymore.
You like Reg are in denial - he has in his sig line the bottom line is that the cells did work - the bottom line is actually that it isn't clear why the cells from just three donors worked - so its not clear that potency can be assured -so its not clear cells will work - until the potency assay is validated on the science. I'm saying on the science now not on just the FDA's opinion because I have to acknowledge its possible the FDA have slipped up on the science evaluation perhaps if the previous experts are not their or are being overruled - that is the only way I can think of that Silviu's statements about the FDA could be true. And I don't think they are true.
I could not possible care less if you think I am a smarty pants or not - I know I got the call right pre CRL #2 and how and why I did. And this is an easier call than that was - because MSB have not obtained any new data from any new patients (had they done that - they'd have said so) rather they have said the opposite - they've said the re-evaluated old data.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MSB
- banter and General Discussion
banter and General Discussion, page-10158
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 748 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MSB (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
92.5¢ |
Change
0.005(0.54%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.056B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
93.0¢ | 93.5¢ | 91.5¢ | $1.473M | 1.596M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 32370 | 92.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
93.0¢ | 60258 | 5 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 32370 | 0.925 |
9 | 98847 | 0.920 |
20 | 130822 | 0.915 |
15 | 194562 | 0.910 |
7 | 97027 | 0.905 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.930 | 60258 | 5 |
0.935 | 28119 | 2 |
0.940 | 20797 | 3 |
0.945 | 59774 | 3 |
0.950 | 26619 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 17/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
MSB (ASX) Chart |