Think you need to get your facts straight old mate....lol. Don't post what you may not know.
I have doubts about AGW, and have posted to that effect on numerous occasions. I don't expect you to have noticed that, but if you're going to make accusations, then it's best that you get your ammo in order. That is the first thing you need to get your head around.
The people who deserve derision on the issue are those like Andrew Bolt who deride and ridicule scientists on the matter, despite that fact that people like Bolt have no proper understanding on the issue. One would seriously have to have a 'minor' issue with self-righteousness to do that?? No?? Perhaps a little issue with what he perceives as left wing agenda?? No??
Bolt clearly displayed his ignorance when he suddenly backed himself into the unfortunate situation where he couldn't avoid a debate/discussion on the matter. And was duly made look pitiful. Was certainly very beautiful to watch. Andy seems strangely quiet on the subject these days?? Perhaps not.....don't read Andy, but I don't see his simplistic offerings on climate change posted on here much lately.
Come out with statements like, "Climate change is absolute crap" or "It's a left wing conspiracy"......and you deserve any derision you get. Unless, of course, you have the proof to sustain a credible argument. I have yet to see one of these 'expert sceptics' like Bolt, Abbott or Minchin who can sustain an argument for more than two minutes.
That, however, doesn't convince me that AGW or whatever you wish to call it is a certainty. Far from it.
Perhaps it's you who needs to work out what he believes??
