Embedded growth opportunities INTERNALLY FUNDED, LOW CAPEX OPTIONALITY., page-192

Hi Spid,
I don't expect anyone to believe anything I say, and I advise people to make their own decisions based on their own research.
For everyone's benefit, please stop requesting us to post images of your past posts. We are already trying to mitigate that, and I'm not going to start posting more. You're doing a good enough job of bombarding the forum with screenshots of the past. If anyone wants to look at your old portfolio of posts, they can and they can discredit them themselves.

Having meticulously combed through the vast repository of posts and updates you've shared over the years, I've formulated some rather pointed insights.

It appears that your predictions and projections consistently fall short of realization. Your propensity to resort to images and screenshots in an attempt to assign blame and discredit is not only regrettably immature but also serves as a stark testament to your knack for self-sabotage, in this case, you seem quite adept at achieving that on your own without me providing images.

You seem keen on insinuating that my focus is solely on you, but rest assured, my scrutiny extends far beyond your singular narrative. Unlike your approach, which seems fixated on perpetuating doubt and discrediting efforts, serious investors adopt a more pragmatic and forward-thinking stance. While project timelines may encounter deviations, the intricate dynamics of mine development are well beyond the control of any investor, regardless of their acumen.

Your rather presumptuous assertion that investors have not diligently researched their decisions, coupled with your dismissive characterization of those who engage with the project as you recently refer to them as "burnt," betrays a profound lack of respect for others' informed judgments.
Despite your relentless drumbeat of negativity, the positive developments emerging from Lindi far outweigh the paltry negatives you tirelessly endeavor to amplify.

You mentioned your enjoyment of being in the spotlight, yet your discernment in choosing when to shine versus when to remain in the shadows remains conspicuously absent.

Your persistent onslaught of skepticism tiptoes perilously close to harassment. Despite my previous attempts to suggest a more restrained and patient approach, you persist in treating your speculative musings as irrefutable truths. Your recent claim regarding “shipment volumes lacking significance” begs the question: upon what credible basis do you substantiate such claims? I urge you to await factual confirmation before disseminating further unsubstantiated assertions.

Your propensity for inundating forums with a deluge of inquiries that largely go unanswered speaks volumes. Few are inclined to engage in what appears to be a futile exercise in semantic jousting.Your apparent agenda to belittle and undermine the investment decisions of others is both transparent and unbecoming. Conversely, I find solace in participating within a community that fervently supports an Australian mining venture, recognizing the broader implications of such endeavors. Is this not one of the main goals? To support an Australian company.
Take a moment to remove the blinders of cynicism that seem to shroud your vision. Lindi Jumbo stands poised on the cusp of significant achievement. If only you could momentarily relinquish your entrenched skepticism and adopt a more open-minded perspective, you might also discern the promising horizon that lies ahead.