Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Which Gal 2:7 is correct, OF or TO ?, page-91

First 91 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
zbusc

7,546 Posts.

1

20/07/24

18:01

Post #: 74842007
Share

Originally posted by wafflehead: ↑

If we know the intended meaning we do not need to get bogged down by such. Some Bibles also use FOR.

The chances that the Bible is so exact that we can debate TO and OF kind of overlooks just how denatured the Bible must be as it has crossed into many different language translations, cultural differences and then travelled from ancient times to now so that the sprit of the age is also lost to us.

It we read the works of Shakespeare from only 400 years ago there are many in-jokes, words and phrases pertaining to that age and we struggle to understand the. The Bible must have suffered far more loss of fidelity than Shakespeare.

I think we read the Bible knowing its a compilation of liturgies produced after the fact and that the precise Teachings of Christ are somewhat diluted from the actual words of Christ. TO / OF / FOR it's okay, relax.

Expand

Yes, I'm happy to stop the "to/of/for' discussion with you since Acts 2:38 & 1 Cor 15:1-4 sorts that out.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Thursday's HotCopper trends: Vault Q4 miss, Peak raise | July 3

ASX Market Close: Local bourse dips red as CBA profit takers swoop

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

CBA

CBA down as BHP goes up – what's going on, and, will CBA stocks correct?

GLF

Gemlife used the ASX's new IPO fast-track. Is this the start of a new cycle?

RML

Resolution looks to 'strong historical data' as Horse Heaven search begins

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

SFM

Why is Santa Fe Minerals up 370% on Thursday?

ASX Market Open: Oz shares dip back (very slightly) after Wed's record close | July 3

CCO

The Calmer Co FY25 revenue hits $8 million, up 86% on FY24

First 91 Last

SPONSORED BY