more bluff wotsup
You can't get basics like who started the term "bible bashing" right, you have buckle of a chance in getting anything right in the bible, as you said you don't know anything and not to swallow
You know full well that you got nothing, you took a particular direction sometime ago with Borwal and finding hard to get out, you just keep using bluffs and smoke screens as you are doing with John 17:3 putting values on it in order to swing it your own way
There are 4 methods that are used to interpret scripture, then there is the critical method or "Devil advocate" putting / adding meaning to where there is not to test it out and making say what one wants it to say
Exactly as you do, playing Devil advocate
Sorry buddy I will not bite to it and sink to your level in any way shape or form no matter how much you post as I know you're posting like this as you disposition is like that, wanting to be right and not taking any "c" from anyone
Sorry, again no dice
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- Which Gal 2:7 is correct, OF or TO ?
Which Gal 2:7 is correct, OF or TO ?, page-121
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online