If you read it properly you wouldn't be talking about what is seen in the first page or so.
In the paper, the Father is referred to as God, and the Son is referred to as the Manifestation of God
If you read it properly, you would have asked for this clarification first.
You didn't read it properly and neither did wotsup who's enjoying the ride you're giving him.
There's a lack of sincerity, and it's obvious.
Kam
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- The gems of Revelation 21
The gems of Revelation 21, page-410
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)