I beleive the JA protocols state that the JA's decision should be made within a "reasonable" timeframe. It's not legislation I know, but it's something.
Courtney has known since the passing of the Bill to ban offshore mining and infrastructure, that her position can NOT be anything other than to reject PEP-11 and yet she IMO is wilfully withholding her duty to finalise what everyone knows is already a forgone decision (i.e rejection).
To wilfully and intentionally delay making a decision under these circumstances would be classified as acting in bad faith and the flow-on effect from that is that the timeframe could only be described as being manifestly "unreasonable".
I agree that nothing looks like it can be done until a decision is made which is the reason for the letter to Courtney (and hopefully some media attention ) is our best option right now.
IMO.
Letter to Courtney Houssos, page-97
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 224 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.2¢ |
Change
-0.001(7.69%) |
Mkt cap ! $14.60M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.2¢ | 1.2¢ | 1.2¢ | $2.332K | 194.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | 6812318 | 1.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3¢ | 578900 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 09.59am 13/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BPH (ASX) Chart |