Segal vs Robertson, page-89

  1. 10,336 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 87
    Ur right about my agenda which is to ensure that Australians become aware of its intent, don’t get conned into losing their freedom of expression simply to placate a religious group.

    Possibly the correct word should be stifled which is the aim of the IHRA guidelines….legal experts have come to that conclusion.

    Including the original Jewish author/drafter of the guidelines who is condemning its usage and he supports other legal minds in their conclusions.

    The only conclusion that I can draw from ur reaction, including 822, is that both of u cannot draft anything form of criticism towards Israel that isn’t deemed antisemitism.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.