“the burden of proof lies with Higgins, she has to prove what she said was true ”
Not true, The judge has to determine to what extent Reynolds reputation was damaged by a few posts.
Already some things don’t make sense if the minister was being “supportive”
Brit Higgins and David Sharaz “conceived a plan to the last detail” to damage Linda Reynolds, page-32
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 227 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)