Both of you keep saying i give no proof from the bible about the son of God Lets stop ignoring my replies to YOUR CLAIMS ITS MY INTERPRETATION and going over the same things over and over Lets address each point made in this post instead of just brushing over my replies,my evidence to your questions i have to keep repeating Lets address each point i make for something new Lets address each point made step by step
OK, let's do that. I can't speak for @wotsup. My point is that I claim that the Bible claims that Jesus is the Son of God but never claims that he is the literal Son of God. I also added that God, being a spiritual being can't have a literal Son. Hence I claimed that a belief in God having a literal Son comes down to interpretation. These remarks are just to summarise my claims. So now to address your points point by point please start by reposting your points - I will take a long time to find them - together with how you like to address them.
Both of you keep saying i give no proof from the bible about the son of God
Lets stop ignoring my replies to YOUR CLAIMS ITS MY INTERPRETATION and going over the same things over and over
Lets address each point made in this post instead of just brushing over my replies,my evidence to your questions i have to keep repeating
