Can someone explain the latest drop?, page-17

>What's been alleged in Court is quite serious and is at odds with your claims "Thats hardly Staff and the Families", in fact Staff and their Families were identified as specific targets in Court documents.

EX-Staff.
this is the point.
Actually it doesnt explicitly say they were employed or not at the time of the investigation, I may have missunderstood or it might be narrative setting but either way...


>If you're an insider and have better knowledge of this it would be good for you to challenge this in Court.
No special information, but performed legally afaik.
It might be distasteful and uncomfortable but there is nothing illegal about taking photos of people in public.

>Lancaster has posted photos of himself holding weapons on Instagram, and photos from his days as a soldier. ".

So what? Why is this narrative setting crap in the article. it has no relevance to the case at hand.

>Ps. I note that your activity on HotCopper is exclusively on the FMG thread
I'm a holder, duh. (also incorrect, its just *most* of my activity)
I noticed you are not......................... ;-)