Beg to disagree with Yat, Pangu.
Without audited up to date financials to back him up, Yats opinion of the value of Animoca lacks credibility.
Yat has always failed to see Animoca from a shareholders perspective.
To us, secondary trading does reflect the value of the company.
If it was valued higher, people would be buying shares, despite how difficult Animoca has made the process.
The fact that the shares are so illiquid indicates that the public considers Animoca shares fair/accurate value given the information available.
Yat's opinion is vested and not able to be supported, shareholders valuation is pragmatic and able to be proven on a day to day basis..
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?