Another shout of praise goes up to Jehovah!, page-2663

  1. 25,173 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1
    "sure wotsup you don't only warp scripture to make it line up with your views, you also eliminate entire verse if it doesn't line up with your views"

    Hmm, I see you're still looking in the mirror when writing your post -> Only true God = Father, Son and Holy Spirit, that you warp into Jesus's clear words.

    Re the Baptism verse, it's is or was on record = fact that it was added, the Baptism part.
    And as I said, Peters CLEAR instructions, baptize in Jesus's name, which is referenced several times DRRRRRR.
    To boot, no other name under heaven to which you are to be saved, not that Baptism saves you.
    A name above ALL names, do you get that -> ALL???????????
    ------------
    "When you do this you eliminate the bible as being what it is, how can one trust the bible"

    It's a well known fact, that certain translations in some areas, have been done so with a trinity mindset = errors as the Interlinears CLEARLY show.
    And there are also errors, not necessarily trinity related and if you were a serious person on seeking truth, you would have noticed this.
    Based on the overall theme of the Bible, which many ignore, some of these errors, should leap out at you.
    -------------
    "dated by modern scholars to the first[2] or (less commonly) second century AD.[3]"

    Rest my case, corruption began from around the 100s.
    You mention 2nd century, this is around where Tertullian is or was on record of saying, that the Baptism part was added.
    This rubbish that the apostles Baptized accordingly, is exactly that rubbish, no where does the Bible show this.
    They Baptized in the name of Jesus.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.