My comment wasn’t directed at anyone in particular; it was more of a passing observation. Similar to a previous situation where some thought processing the 30 bleed patients would take a very long time, but I suggested it might be quicker - and indeed, it ended up taking less than half the time people were expecting. Just a reminder that sometimes things can move faster than anticipated.
If you have any concerns or thoughts about those unknowns, maybe call the company and discuss?
In the end, all we can do is wait and see how things unfold. Personally I am going to follow the official estimates provided by Scott/EMV team with some minor tolerance of error and unforeseen circumstances.
In saying that, I've been a shareholder since 2017 so in the event the timeline balloons for an unforeseen reason it really doesn't bother me.
(20min delay)