Back at the start there were many technologists who said the iWebgate/Netlinkz technology could never work. I was one of them, and I was derided, mocked, taunted and insulted, as were all the "nay-sayers". As far as I am aware, I am the only one who stuck it out to the end. I wanted to be here, smiling, when I was proved correct. Which I have been.
While I would agree that shareholders have been led on, that does not mean they were lied to. Back when I was analysing the NET updates, I would point out the "weasel words" NET were using, and how they made everything look so much better than a rational, informed analysis clearly showed it to be. But no one cared. I wasn't a shareholder so my analysis meant nothing, and all I got was abuse.
The reality is that the shareholders wanted to believe it all. But they can't say they weren't warned. I warned them.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NET
- FULL DISCLOSURE ON EXPENSES - NOW
FULL DISCLOSURE ON EXPENSES - NOW, page-94
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 20 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NET (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $11.63M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
NET (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable